Real Estate Agents seem basically useless
11-02-2011 03:45 AM
I went and looked at some houses the other day.
I've already bought 2, so Im familiar with the process.
The worst part of house shopping is listening to the sellers agent pitch you, and then EVERY TIME they try to be your agent also, so they can double their commission. Then EVERY TIME they try to BS you about "pocket listings" so you will let them ne your agent.... like some mythical deal is going to come along and you will save 50K on a house by having the right agent. C'mon get real.
At this point, we can already see what's for sale. Just look it up on redfin. We don't need agents to tell us what houses are for sale in what neighborhoods.
You either have the money/mortgage or you don't
the seller will either take your offer or he won't
you either want the house or you don't
There's a lot of paper to push, but I imagine there could be services who do it for a few hundred bucks.
Why are seller giving away 6% of their money to these agents? I don't see the point.
Is it because they write dumb-ass descriptions that we all have to endure as we browse online?
Is it for the annoying sales pitch?
Is it because they offer a bunch of info on the house, which isn't trustworthy, and needs to be verified by the buyer anyway?
**bleep** I am tired of these people sniffin my ass to figure out how much money I make as soon as I walk in.
Re: Real Estate Agents seem basically useless
11-02-2011 09:57 AM
To be fair, there are agents who do their homework and go the extra mile to ensure listings are accurate and spend the money to dress up the place, spend advertising dollars (newspaper, fliers, etc), to get the homes sold. But I hear you. When do my buttons get pushed?
-when I know more about the listing than the agent
-when I can correct them about the school district
-when I can point out what needs to be fixed and how much it costs
Re: Real Estate Agents seem basically useless
[ Edited ]11-02-2011 11:46 AM - edited 11-02-2011 11:47 AM
Why are seller giving away 6% of their money to these agents? I don't see the point.
I agree, it's an outdated model that I'm sure will change in the future.
But I'm sure some agents are shady enough to get a listing to drop their price, but only if they get double commisions.
Re: Real Estate Agents seem basically useless
11-02-2011 11:53 AM
There are really things like pocket listings. I hear Agents pitch them every week - out in the open, to other Agents.
If a realtor says they have a pocket listing, the first and best response is "Great! I'll put my Realtor in touch with you about this property and see if a deal can be hashed out". If the agent then says, "well, I'd like to show it myself" - as often will happen, you know immediately who you're dealing with. If the Agent say "fantastic, I'd like to sell the house right away, once the sellers decide to move ahead", it's a real deal, worth exploring if you have the time to spend.
Not all Real Estate Agents are trolls, but without an efficient screening process, they all sure seem like they are.
Thanks for reading,
See all my reviews
Re: Real Estate Agents seem basically useless
11-02-2011 11:56 AM
Pasta wrote:Why are seller giving away 6% of their money to these agents? I don't see the point.
I agree, it's an outdated model that I'm sure will change in the future.
But I'm sure some agents are shady enough to get a listing to drop their price, but only if they get double commissions.
It's well worth the fee, thats why I am sure it will be around for a LOOOOONG time.
And agents are free to negotiate their commissions- in fact its required BY LAW that all fees be negotiable - nothing at all shady about a broker lowering their fee. its done all the time
Re: Real Estate Agents seem basically useless
11-02-2011 12:37 PM
Pasta wrote:Why are seller giving away 6% of their money to these agents? I don't see the point.
I agree, it's an outdated model that I'm sure will change in the future.
But I'm sure some agents are shady enough to get a listing to drop their price, but only if they get double commissions.
6% isn't even really the standard anymore. In fact if you're in Southern California and you're searching our site we calculate any potential refund based on 5%, or 2.5% to the buyer's agent. The model works, but it does rely on reputable agents, and we're trying to help bring some transparency to the process, but it isn't going to change overnight. Look at the blow back we got from the scouting report.
There are slimy individuals in every industry including real estate agents. The best thing anyone can do to cut down on that is bring to light the individuals giving the industry a bad name and don't feed them any business. Though, assigning a generic description to everyone in any industry is a bit ignorant and not very productive.
That's my $0.02. Have a great day,
Re: Real Estate Agents seem basically useless
11-02-2011 02:19 PM
I'm not talking about "shady indiviuals" or a few bad eggs here and there.
I'm saying all of them are unnecessary.
I think you should just find a house by searching the internet and then go see it, have it inspected, negotiate a price and buy it if you like it. It could be just like buying a TV.
Hey everyone! Post here if you've ever bought a "pocket listing" and gotten a significant discount on the price as a result. Let's hear it.
"Significant discount" is the implication that agents use in order to reel you in and get a double commission. So let's hear if it really happens...from an actual buyer please, not an agent spreading fantasies.
Re: Real Estate Agents seem basically useless
11-02-2011 03:55 PM
Pocket listing pitches go something like this:
"I've got a past client thinking of selling his 4br house in Santa Monica. It's probably going to sell in the $750,000 range. Once the owner finalizes his divorce, he'll be ready to sell, probably in the next 30 days."
Agents will ask what neighborhood it's in, if it's got a pool, etc, based on what their current buyer clients are looking for. Many times deals are made during Realtor office pitch meetings or at local Realtor board sponsored meetings. At these meetings I'd say 5 to 10 upcoming properties are pitched, with one or so resulting in an eventual deal.
In the OP, a realtor is pitching their double extra special secret intel they will only share with a buyer who works with them (a paraphrase...) Those kinds of deals really aren't .
Thanks for reading,
See all my reviews
