The Dribble Out Method
06-18-2009 10:02 AM
Re: The Dribble Out Method
06-18-2009 10:33 AM
REOs are dribbling out, but not because banks want to. They are just understaffed and have so much work to do they can't get everything on the market fast enough.
The Merc said that it seemed the most banks could process in a month was like 40-42,000- nationwide.
An agent that sells REOs said that she gets banks packets within 48 hours for their approval to put a house on the market, and it takes them 2-3 weeks to get back to her. They are just so busy they can't keep up.
And honestly, that makes much more sense to me than holding back, given that REOs are receiving multiple offers all over the Bay Area at this point.
Re: The Dribble Out Method
[ Edited ]06-18-2009 11:01 AM - last edited on 06-18-2009 12:48 PM by ChrisG
Honestly I just clicked on this thread because the name was so curiosity-inducing. I'm sure there's a suspect real estate joke there somewhere to be made, but I'll keep it free of my twisted humor around here.
Thanks for sharing your ideas about real estate owned sales, and keep on coming up with such amusing titles!
Cheers,
Brian
Re: The Dribble Out Method & understaff ed banks.
06-18-2009 01:32 PM
hamstar wrote: "REOs are dribbling out, but not because banks want to. They are just understaffed and have so much work to do they can't get everything on the market fast enough."
Hmmmm -- I hear there are a few people looking for work. Maybe the banks should increase staff?
Re: The Dribble Out Method
06-18-2009 07:51 PM
How can you have so called multiple offers pushing higher prices
when the sale prices are well under askings , and the GAP is growing?
Only the REA like to make you think there are multiple offers !!!
Look at the asking and sales prices differences...its 10% difference...
http://www.redfin.com/city/17675/CA/Santa-Clara-Sa
Re: The Dribble Out Method
06-18-2009 09:30 PM
Re: The Dribble Out Method
06-18-2009 09:50 PM
"Obviously, they are not giving us names/numbers...that would be illegal."
Far from it! Nothing illegal allowing the marketplace to be fully transparent...
"the estimated amount for which a property should exchange on the date of valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently, and without compulsion."
As any good auditor would say... get confirmation. How can you have a meaningful transaction when the transaction is one sided where in your the dark regarding prices?
